Case Studies / Financial Statement Analysis / Behind the Sushi Counter
Behind the Sushi Counter
Sales rose 26%. The give-back sits in overhead, not the kitchen.Illustration · Pau Analytics
Earnings analysis

Behind the Sushi Counter

A 26% rise, and where the margin went

Pau AnalyticsAnalyst reportFY2026 · RM’000

Empire Sushi grew its sales by more than a quarter in the year to March 2026, and it kept slightly more of every sales ringgit as gross profit than the year before. Yet less of that growth reached the bottom line. This report lifts the lid on the statement to show where, in the numbers, the gap opened, and leaves the why to those who run the business.

The numbers
+26.1%
revenue growth
42.5%
gross margin (+0.8 ppt)
15.4%
net margin (−0.7 ppt)
+80.5%
admin expense growth

“Sales rose 26% and the gross margin even improved, yet the net margin slipped. The give-back sits in overhead, not in the kitchen.”

What the data shows

What we found

Empire Premium Food Berhad, which trades as Empire Sushi, runs 143 grab-and-go and quick dine-in sushi outlets across Malaysia and listed on Bursa Malaysia in April 2026. In the year to 31 March 2026 it grew revenue 26.1%, from RM235.6M to RM297.1M, and gross profit grew even faster, up 28.4%. So far, a clean growth story.

The lid lifts on the lines below gross profit. Profit after tax grew only 20.6%, slower than both revenue and gross profit, and the net margin eased from 16.1% to 15.4%. Because this was the company's first reported year as a listed group, there is no prior-year quarter to compare, so the reading here is the full year against the year before.

1. Growth, at two speeds

Revenue grew faster than profit
Year-on-year growth, by line
Source: Empire Premium Food Berhad, Q4 FY2026 interim report.

Revenue rose 26.1% and gross profit 28.4%, but profit after tax rose only 20.6%. The three did not move together. The widening gap between the top line and the bottom line is the first thread to pull, and it tells us the squeeze happened somewhere between gross profit and net profit, not in the cost of the food itself.

2. A split decision on margins

Gross margin up, net margin down
Margin at each level of the statement, FY2025 vs FY2026
Source: Empire Premium Food Berhad, Q4 FY2026 interim report.

The margins do not all move the same way. Gross margin improved, from 41.7% to 42.5%, so the business kept more of each sales ringgit after the cost of food. But operating margin fell from 21.7% to 20.8%, and net margin from 16.1% to 15.4%. An improving gross margin sitting above a falling net margin points to the cause living in the middle of the statement, in the running costs, not in the kitchen.

3. Where the margin moved

Cost of sales eased, overhead climbed
Each cost as a share of revenue, FY2025 vs FY2026
Source: Empire Premium Food Berhad, Q4 FY2026 interim report.

Reading each line as a share of revenue locates the shift. Cost of sales actually fell, from 58.3% to 57.5% of revenue, which is why the gross margin improved. Distribution costs held roughly steady near 15% of revenue. The change sits in administrative expenses, which jumped from 4.7% to 6.7% of revenue: in ringgit they grew 80.5%, more than three times the pace of sales.

Part of that rise is a one-off RM2.93M expense for the listing itself. Even setting that aside, administrative costs still grew about 54%, well ahead of the 26% rise in sales, as the group added head-office headcount ahead of new outlet openings.

4. From a ringgit of sales to net profit

Revenue to net profit bridge
How RM297.1M of revenue becomes RM45.7M of net profit (RM’000)
Source: Empire Premium Food Berhad, Q4 FY2026 interim report.

The bridge shows each step from the top line down. Cost of sales takes the largest bite, leaving RM126.2M of gross profit; distribution and administrative costs together remove most of the rest, and tax takes the final slice, leaving RM45.7M. Two small inflows, other income and interest earned on a healthy cash pile, nudge the total back up along the way.

5. Where the sales come from

Revenue by outlet format
Share of FY2026 revenue
Source: Empire Premium Food Berhad, Q4 FY2026 interim report, Review of Performance.

The group reports as a single business, but it splits its sales by outlet format. Grab-and-go outlets, 127 of them, bring in 87.3% of revenue; 16 quick dine-in outlets bring the remaining 12.7%. The company does not break out profit or a prior-year figure by format, so this view shows the mix today, not how each format is trending or how profitable each one is.

What the numbers reveal

Put together, the statement tells one clear factual story. This was a year of strong, 26% sales growth in which the business held, and even improved, the margin on the food it sells, but gave some of that back in running costs: administrative overhead grew far faster than sales, easing the net margin even as gross margin rose. The cause sits in the middle of the statement, not at the top.

Two things sit alongside that. The group is debt-free and strongly cash-generative, turning RM71.6M of operating cash from RM297M of sales and ending the year with RM64.6M of cash and deposits. Against that, it paid out RM42.0M of dividends during the year, close to its RM45.7M of profit, mostly as large interim dividends to its owners before the public listing. The business funds itself comfortably from its own cash; how much of future profit stays in the business now that it is public is a question the numbers here cannot answer.

Questions the numbers raise
Method & data

Built from Empire Premium Food Berhad's unaudited interim report for the fourth quarter and full year ended 31 March 2026. Because the company listed in April 2026, there is no comparative prior-year quarter, so the analysis reads the full financial year (FY2026) against the prior year (FY2025). From the profit and loss statement it computes vertical analysis (each line as a share of revenue), horizontal analysis (the year-on-year change), the margin ladder, the revenue-to-net-profit bridge, and the revenue mix by outlet format. The group reports as a single operating segment; the format split is a management disclosure without a profit or prior-year breakdown. Figures in RM'000.